Daga Fakira Mali vs The Collector Advocate - Deshpande A.S. — 71/2024
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHAU080027942024
Filing Number
1116/2024
Filing Date
14-Jun-2013
Registration No
71/2024
Registration Date
26-Sep-2013
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Daga Fakira Mali
Adv. Patil K.B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Collector Advocate - Deshpande A.S.
-
2.Executive Engineer
Case History
-
31-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
20-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
18-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 71/2024 Summary The court allowed the petitioner Daga Fakira Mali's land acquisition (bhusampadhan) direction application, permitting necessary corrections to the petition within 14 days. The respondents' objections were overruled, with the court finding sufficient grounds to proceed based on the merits presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
02-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
11-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
06-Feb-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
24-Jan-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
15-Jan-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
08-Jan-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
05-Aug-2024
Steps_Unready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
24-Jul-2024
Steps_Unready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
02-Jul-2024
Supply of Copies
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
07-May-2024
Supply of Copies
CIVIL Judge Senior Division, Sillod
-
12-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jun-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2024
Case 71/2024 Summary The court allowed the petitioner Daga Fakira Mali's land acquisition (bhusampadhan) direction application, permitting necessary corrections to the petition within 14 days. The respondents' objections were overruled, with the court finding sufficient grounds to proceed based on the merits presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts