Bank of Baroda vs Kaduba Fakira Lokhande — 240/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Contested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU080023782025
e-Filing Number
26-08-2025
Filing Number
970/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
240/2025
Registration Date
29-08-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, SILLOD
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of Baroda
Adv. Dhakre S.K.
Respondent(s)
Kaduba Fakira Lokhande
Sunil Sandu Lokhande
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION, SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Ex-Parte Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Bank of Baroda v. Kaduba Fakira Lokhande & Sunil Sandu Lokhande (240/2025) The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sillod, partly decreed Bank of Baroda's suit for recovery of a defaulted agricultural term loan. The court ordered defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,53,192.16 with 9.60% per annum interest from 05.12.2024 until realization, rejecting the bank's claim for 2% penal interest due to lack of justification. The bank was also granted the right to foreclose the mortgaged agricultural property if payment remains outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Bank of Baroda v. Kaduba Fakira Lokhande & Sunil Sandu Lokhande (240/2025) The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sillod, partly decreed Bank of Baroda's suit for recovery of a defaulted agricultural term loan. The court ordered defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 4,53,192.16 with 9.60% per annum interest from 05.12.2024 until realization, rejecting the bank's claim for 2% penal interest due to lack of justification. The bank was also granted the right to foreclose the mortgaged agricultural property if payment remains outstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts