Ravsaheb Haribhau Wagh vs Vitthal Manikarao Wagh Advocate - Pandit M.S. — 226/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU080022492025

e-Filing Number

11-08-2025

Filing Number

918/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

226/2025

Registration Date

16-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravsaheb Haribhau Wagh

    Adv. Deshpande A.V.

  2. 2.Sakhubai Haribhau Wagh

    Adv. Deshpande A.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Manikarao Wagh Advocate - Pandit M.S.

  2. 2.Sudhakar Vitthal Wagh

  3. 3.Vinayak Vitthal Wagh

  4. 4.Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Wagh

  5. 5.Kailas Vitthal Wagh

  6. 6.Suman Vitthal Wagh

  7. 7.Sheshrao Manikrao Wagh

  8. 8.Chandrakala Sheshrao Wagh

  9. 9.Rahul Sheshrao Wagh

  10. 10.Prabhu Manikrao Wagh

  11. 11.Vandana Prabhu Wagh

  12. 12.Nilesh Prabhu Wagh

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 226/2025 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside a No Written Statement (W.S.) order previously passed against Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 5-12. The defendants argued delay in receiving material documents prevented timely filing, while the plaintiff opposed, claiming the application was frivolous. The court found that allowing defendants to decide the suit on merit would not prejudice the plaintiff. Accordingly, the No W.S. order was set aside subject to payment of Rs. 200/- cost to Taluka Legal Aid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  15. 31-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  16. 04-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  17. 29-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  18. 29-Aug-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 226/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 226/2025 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside a No Written Statement (W.S.) order previously passed against Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 5-12. The defendants argued delay in receiving material documents prevented timely filing, while the plaintiff opposed, claiming the application was frivolous. The court found that allowing defendants to decide the suit on merit would not prejudice the plaintiff. Accordingly, the No W.S. order was set aside subject to payment of Rs. 200/- cost to Taluka Legal Aid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case