Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli vs State Of Maharashtsra — 125/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(1),336(3),201,198,199,255,256,61(1),3(8) 3(5))). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080013832025

e-Filing Number

23-05-2025

Filing Number

804/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

125/2025

Registration Date

23-May-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

3-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

SILLOD CITY

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(1),336(3),201,198,199,255,256,61(1),3(8) 3(5)))

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtsra

  2. 2.Dilip Tukaram Shirsath

    Adv. Tambe S.B.

  3. 3.Swati Shamrao Salve

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

  4. 4.Vikas Mina

  5. 5.Jayashri Chavan

  6. 6.Suresh Bedmutha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 125/2025) The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking investigation into alleged criminal offenses by education officials regarding irregular teacher deputation orders. The court found no prima facie cognizable offense, noting the applicant had no direct connection to the affected schools and that the administrative misconduct (improper transfer authorization) had already been addressed through disciplinary action (strict warning) by competent authorities. The decision emphasized that administrative breaches constitute disciplinary matters, not criminal offenses, and rejected frivolous complaints by unconnected third parties against public servants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Report

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Report

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Report

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Report

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  17. 30-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  18. 16-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  19. 08-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  21. 10-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 10-Jun-2025

    Report

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  23. 26-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 125/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 125/2025) The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking investigation into alleged criminal offenses by education officials regarding irregular teacher deputation orders. The court found no prima facie cognizable offense, noting the applicant had no direct connection to the affected schools and that the administrative misconduct (improper transfer authorization) had already been addressed through disciplinary action (strict warning) by competent authorities. The decision emphasized that administrative breaches constitute disciplinary matters, not criminal offenses, and rejected frivolous complaints by unconnected third parties against public servants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case