Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli vs State Of Maharashtsra — 125/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(1),336(3),201,198,199,255,256,61(1),3(8) 3(5))). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 16th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080013832025
e-Filing Number
23-05-2025
Filing Number
804/2025
Filing Date
23-05-2025
Registration No
125/2025
Registration Date
23-05-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
Police Station
SILLOD CITY
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtsra
Dilip Tukaram Shirsath
Adv. Tambe S.B.
Swati Shamrao Salve
Adv. Panpatil V.U.
Vikas Mina
Jayashri Chavan
Suresh Bedmutha
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 24-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 125/2025) The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking investigation into alleged criminal offenses by education officials regarding irregular teacher deputation orders. The court found no prima facie cognizable offense, noting the applicant had no direct connection to the affected schools and that the administrative misconduct (improper transfer authorization) had already been addressed through disciplinary action (strict warning) by competent authorities. The decision emphasized that administrative breaches constitute disciplinary matters, not criminal offenses, and rejected frivolous complaints by unconnected third parties against public servants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ganesh Shankarlal Shankarpelli v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 125/2025) The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking investigation into alleged criminal offenses by education officials regarding irregular teacher deputation orders. The court found no prima facie cognizable offense, noting the applicant had no direct connection to the affected schools and that the administrative misconduct (improper transfer authorization) had already been addressed through disciplinary action (strict warning) by competent authorities. The decision emphasized that administrative breaches constitute disciplinary matters, not criminal offenses, and rejected frivolous complaints by unconnected third parties against public servants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts