State of Maharashtra vs Janardhan Saluba Gaikwad Advocate - Gorade R.S. — 207/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU080006612023
Filing Number
444/2023
Filing Date
10-Apr-2023
Registration No
207/2023
Registration Date
19-Apr-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
SILLOD R
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Janardhan Saluba Gaikwad Advocate - Gorade R.S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Summary of Case 207/2023 The court dismissed the State of Maharashtra's petition challenging an advocate's acquittal under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). The court found insufficient evidence to support the charges, as the alleged confiscated liquor quantity and supporting documents were not credibly established, and the accused's testimony regarding his possession and actions was not contradicted by reliable prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
15-Sep-2025
Appearance
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
15-Feb-2025
Appearance
-
15-Mar-2024
Appearance
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
12-Dec-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
12-Aug-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
19-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 207/2023
Summary of Case 207/2023 The court dismissed the State of Maharashtra's petition challenging an advocate's acquittal under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). The court found insufficient evidence to support the charges, as the alleged confiscated liquor quantity and supporting documents were not credibly established, and the accused's testimony regarding his possession and actions was not contradicted by reliable prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts