Shaikh Mohammed Khalil Pashumiyan vs State of Maharashtra — 74/2026

Case under Passport Act 1950 Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080006342026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

3-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

105

Police Station

SILLOD CITY

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Passport Act 1950 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaikh Mohammed Khalil Pashumiyan

    Adv. Pathan H.K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted Shaikh Mohammed Khalil Pashumiyan's application to renew his passport for 10 years, holding that pending criminal proceedings alone do not justify denying a citizen's fundamental right to renew passport for religious pilgrimage. The court imposed a condition that the applicant must inform the court and submit detailed itineraries of any foreign visits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd J.m.f.c., Sillod

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Shaikh Mohammed Khalil Pashumiyan's application to renew his passport for 10 years, holding that pending criminal proceedings alone do not justify denying a citizen's fundamental right to renew passport for religious pilgrimage. The court imposed a condition that the applicant must inform the court and submit detailed itineraries of any foreign visits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case