Shaikh Anis Shaikh Usman vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Sillod City — 63/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080005542026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
331/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
0168
Police Station
SILLOD CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Anis Shaikh Usman
Adv. Pathan I.I.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Sillod City
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Shaikh Anis Shaikh Usman's application for interim custody of her seized Bajaj Auto Rikshaw, holding that prolonged police custody would cause mechanical damage to the vehicle and citing the principle that seized property should not be kept in custody indefinitely. The court granted release of the vehicle on conditions including a ₹3 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell or alter it, and producing it when directed until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Shaikh Anis Shaikh Usman's application for interim custody of her seized Bajaj Auto Rikshaw, holding that prolonged police custody would cause mechanical damage to the vehicle and citing the principle that seized property should not be kept in custody indefinitely. The court granted release of the vehicle on conditions including a ₹3 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell or alter it, and producing it when directed until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts