Krushna Sitaram Potdukhe vs State Excise Office State of Maharashtra — 60/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080005272026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
314/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
SILLOD R
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushna Sitaram Potdukhe
Adv. Suradkar V.S.
Respondent(s)
State Excise Office State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 60/2026 Krushna Sitaram Potdukhe v. State Excise Office, Maharashtra The court allowed Krushna's application for interim custody of his seized car (MH-14-CK-8787) after verifying his ownership through RC book, Aadhaar card, and insurance documents. The court rejected the State Excise Department's objections, finding no legitimate purpose in retaining the vehicle at the police station and following Supreme Court directions in *Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The applicant was granted temporary custody upon executing a supurtnama bond of Rs. 1,50,000, with conditions prohibiting sale, pledge, or alteration until case conclusion and requiring detailed vehicle documentation and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 60/2026 Krushna Sitaram Potdukhe v. State Excise Office, Maharashtra The court allowed Krushna's application for interim custody of his seized car (MH-14-CK-8787) after verifying his ownership through RC book, Aadhaar card, and insurance documents. The court rejected the State Excise Department's objections, finding no legitimate purpose in retaining the vehicle at the police station and following Supreme Court directions in *Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The applicant was granted temporary custody upon executing a supurtnama bond of Rs. 1,50,000, with conditions prohibiting sale, pledge, or alteration until case conclusion and requiring detailed vehicle documentation and photographs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts