Kamlakar Aanna Sapkal vs State of Maharashtra — 58/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080005152026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

310/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

AJINTHA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamlakar Aanna Sapkal

    Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 58/2026 - Kamlakar Aanna Sapkal v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the petitioner's appeal against dismissal from service under the Indian Penal Security Act 2023. The court found that the State's termination order lacked proper procedure and violated the petitioner's rights, ordering reinstatement with 30,000 rupees compensation and directing the motorway authority to follow due process in future disciplinary actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 58/2026 - Kamlakar Aanna Sapkal v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the petitioner's appeal against dismissal from service under the Indian Penal Security Act 2023. The court found that the State's termination order lacked proper procedure and violated the petitioner's rights, ordering reinstatement with 30,000 rupees compensation and directing the motorway authority to follow due process in future disciplinary actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case