Krushna Suresh Gawali vs State Of Maharastra — 54/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080005072026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

306/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

AJINTHA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krushna Suresh Gawali

    Adv. Ingle K.U.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharastra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by Krushna Suresh Gawali against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner challenged an order under the National Security Act, 2023, and the court found the detention order defective and lacking proper justification. The court directed the state to release the petitioner and quash the detention order, while also imposing a compensation of Rs. 30,000 for wrongful detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Krushna Suresh Gawali against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner challenged an order under the National Security Act, 2023, and the court found the detention order defective and lacking proper justification. The court directed the state to release the petitioner and quash the detention order, while also imposing a compensation of Rs. 30,000 for wrongful detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case