Sushmabai Bhika Palodkar vs State of Maharashtra — 86/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080003102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

137/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Sushmabai Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Sunil Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Subhash Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Ramesh Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Jija Bhagwanrao Kapse

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Sumitra Daulatrao Chathe

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Anil Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Ganesh Bhika Palodkar

Adv. Dandge D.P.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

17-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

03-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Sushmabai Bhika Palodkar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (86/2026) The court allowed the petition and set aside orders dismissing the petitioners' writ application based on procedural defects. The court found that the respondent State failed to provide a valid legal basis for dismissing the case and that the petitioners' substantial grievances regarding alleged violations of statutory provisions warranted proper judicial consideration rather than dismissal on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sushmabai Bhika Palodkar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (86/2026) The court allowed the petition and set aside orders dismissing the petitioners' writ application based on procedural defects. The court found that the respondent State failed to provide a valid legal basis for dismissing the case and that the petitioners' substantial grievances regarding alleged violations of statutory provisions warranted proper judicial consideration rather than dismissal on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case