Sanjay Ukhardu Bhopatkar vs State of Maharashtra — 89/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080003082026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Ukhardu Bhopatkar

    Adv. Bawaskar R.B.

  2. 2.Sudhakar Ukhardu Bhopatkar

    Adv. Bawaskar R.B.

  3. 3.Sushila Baburao Chandol

    Adv. Bawaskar R.B.

  4. 4.Sangeeta Suresh Folane

    Adv. Bawaskar R.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by Sanjay Ukhardu Bhopatkar, Sudhakar Ukhardu Bhopatkar, and Sushila Baburao Chandol against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 1 and 2 were violated and that the State failed to provide adequate legal notice and opportunity to be heard before taking administrative action. The court set aside the impugned orders and directed the State to follow proper procedure under the Maharashtra Civil Rules and the Indian Constitution before implementing any action against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Sanjay Ukhardu Bhopatkar, Sudhakar Ukhardu Bhopatkar, and Sushila Baburao Chandol against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 1 and 2 were violated and that the State failed to provide adequate legal notice and opportunity to be heard before taking administrative action. The court set aside the impugned orders and directed the State to follow proper procedure under the Maharashtra Civil Rules and the Indian Constitution before implementing any action against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case