Narayan Devrao Khandve vs State of Maharastra — 57/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080001982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

94/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Narayan Devrao Khandve

Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Ashok Narayan Khandve

Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Bhausaheb Narayan Khandve

Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Mandabai Bhikan Kabade

Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Panchipula Navnath Dhamale

Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharastra

Hearing History

Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

20-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case