Narayan Devrao Khandve vs State of Maharastra — 57/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080001982026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Devrao Khandve
Adv. Jadhav A.P.
Ashok Narayan Khandve
Adv. Jadhav A.P.
Bhausaheb Narayan Khandve
Adv. Jadhav A.P.
Mandabai Bhikan Kabade
Adv. Jadhav A.P.
Panchipula Navnath Dhamale
Adv. Jadhav A.P.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharastra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 20-02-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts