Narayan Devrao Khandve vs State of Maharastra — 57/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080001982026

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

94/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Devrao Khandve

    Adv. Jadhav A.P.

  2. 2.Ashok Narayan Khandve

    Adv. Jadhav A.P.

  3. 3.Bhausaheb Narayan Khandve

    Adv. Jadhav A.P.

  4. 4.Mandabai Bhikan Kabade

    Adv. Jadhav A.P.

  5. 5.Panchipula Navnath Dhamale

    Adv. Jadhav A.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharastra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 57/2026 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petition, directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a revised declaration under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita regarding the petitioners' arrest and detention. The court found that while the arrest was justified, the statutory requirements under the applicable law were not properly followed, warranting corrective measures. Key Reasoning: The court held that though the petitioners' arrest had legal basis, the State failed to comply with mandatory procedural provisions in issuing arrest memoranda and detention documents. The judgment emphasized that proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures are essential safeguards under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case