Sakharabai Siratam Gavali vs State of Maharashtra — 22/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080000412026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2026
Filing Number
23/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sakharabai Siratam Gavali
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Rukhamanbai Pandurang Navagire
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Gajrabai Ramdas Jagtap
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Gayabai Khandu Bhujang
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Prakash Totaraam Dandage
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Jijabai Eknath Dandage
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Samadhan Eknath Dandage
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Bhandas Eknath Dandage
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Bhagvat Eknath Dandage
Adv. Dandge B.K.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 22/2026 The court partially allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra's dismissal orders. The court found that while the petitioners were validly appointed, the dismissal proceedings violated procedural safeguards and fair hearing requirements under the Mumbai Agriculture Act, 1827 and Indian Constitution Article 14. The court set aside the dismissal orders and directed reinstatement with appropriate relief, while upholding the State's regulatory authority over agricultural personnel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 22/2026 The court partially allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra's dismissal orders. The court found that while the petitioners were validly appointed, the dismissal proceedings violated procedural safeguards and fair hearing requirements under the Mumbai Agriculture Act, 1827 and Indian Constitution Article 14. The court set aside the dismissal orders and directed reinstatement with appropriate relief, while upholding the State's regulatory authority over agricultural personnel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts