Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar vs Nil — 858/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU070074672025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-12-2025

Filing Number

5132/2025

Filing Date

18-12-2025

Registration No

858/2025

Registration Date

18-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar

Adv. Lande S.K.

Usha Vishwanath Dhumal

Adv. Lande S.K.

Mathurabai Shankar Bomble

Sakubai Namdeo Tejinkar

Amol Namdeo Tejinkar

Ravikant Namdeo Tejinkar

Chhaya Anil Ghodke

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR

22-04-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

Arguments

15-04-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

12-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

04-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 858/2025 The court granted the application and formally recognized applicants Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar, Usha Vishwanath Dhumal, and Mathurabai Shankar Bomble as legal heirs of three deceased persons under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found no objections after publishing notices in newspapers and posting on official boards, and accepted unchallenged affidavits and death certificates as evidence of heirship. The court issued a heirship certificate for government and semi-government purposes only, clarifying it is merely a formal declaration of heirship and not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 858/2025 The court granted the application and formally recognized applicants Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar, Usha Vishwanath Dhumal, and Mathurabai Shankar Bomble as legal heirs of three deceased persons under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found no objections after publishing notices in newspapers and posting on official boards, and accepted unchallenged affidavits and death certificates as evidence of heirship. The court issued a heirship certificate for government and semi-government purposes only, clarifying it is merely a formal declaration of heirship and not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case