Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar vs Nil — 858/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070074672025
e-Filing Number
14-12-2025
Filing Number
5132/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Registration No
858/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar
Adv. Lande S.K.
Usha Vishwanath Dhumal
Adv. Lande S.K.
Mathurabai Shankar Bomble
Sakubai Namdeo Tejinkar
Amol Namdeo Tejinkar
Ravikant Namdeo Tejinkar
Chhaya Anil Ghodke
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 12-03-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 04-03-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 858/2025 The court granted the application and formally recognized applicants Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar, Usha Vishwanath Dhumal, and Mathurabai Shankar Bomble as legal heirs of three deceased persons under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found no objections after publishing notices in newspapers and posting on official boards, and accepted unchallenged affidavits and death certificates as evidence of heirship. The court issued a heirship certificate for government and semi-government purposes only, clarifying it is merely a formal declaration of heirship and not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 858/2025 The court granted the application and formally recognized applicants Bhausaheb Rajaram Tejinkar, Usha Vishwanath Dhumal, and Mathurabai Shankar Bomble as legal heirs of three deceased persons under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827. The court found no objections after publishing notices in newspapers and posting on official boards, and accepted unchallenged affidavits and death certificates as evidence of heirship. The court issued a heirship certificate for government and semi-government purposes only, clarifying it is merely a formal declaration of heirship and not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts