Kartik Devidas Labde vs Devidas Pandurang Labde — 820/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,1,2,,O7,1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU070065002025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-09-2025
Filing Number
4654/2025
Filing Date
01-10-2025
Registration No
820/2025
Registration Date
01-10-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
6-JT. CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION GANGAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kartik Devidas Labde
Adv. Mungase B.G.
Pooja Devidas Labde
Arti Devidas Labde
Sangita Devidas Labde
Respondent(s)
Devidas Pandurang Labde
Vijay Suvalal Lodha
Hearing History
Judge: 6-JT. CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION GANGAPUR
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case 820/2025 Summary The petition filed by Kartik Devidas Labde, Pooja Devidas Labde, and Arti Devidas Labde seeking to set aside a one-sided order (dated 14.01.2026) passed against respondents Devidas Pandurang Labde and Vijay Suvalal Lodha has been partially allowed with costs. The court found that the petition was filed seven days after the one-sided order without adequate explanation for the delay, and while setting aside that order to ensure fair trial on merits, imposed ₹100 as cost on the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 820/2025 Summary The petition filed by Kartik Devidas Labde, Pooja Devidas Labde, and Arti Devidas Labde seeking to set aside a one-sided order (dated 14.01.2026) passed against respondents Devidas Pandurang Labde and Vijay Suvalal Lodha has been partially allowed with costs. The court found that the petition was filed seven days after the one-sided order without adequate explanation for the delay, and while setting aside that order to ensure fair trial on merits, imposed ₹100 as cost on the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts