Prakash Rambhau Chitte vs Ravikumar Rameshwar Garg — 808/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU070062932025

W.S. and Say

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

12-09-2025

Filing Number

4545/2025

Filing Date

15-09-2025

Registration No

808/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

6-JT. CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION GANGAPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Prakash Rambhau Chitte

Adv. KARHALE KISHOR RAOSAHEB

Respondent(s)

Ravikumar Rameshwar Garg

Utkarsh Ravikumar Garg

Charchit Ravikumar Garg

Mandabai Rambhau Chitte

Adv. Narode S.K.

Sanjay Rambhau Chitte

Ashok Rambhau Chitte

Circle Officer Division Bhendala

Talathi Saza kaigaon

Hearing History

Judge: 6-JT. CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION GANGAPUR

18-04-2026

W.S. and Say

12-03-2026

W.S. and Say

25-02-2026

W.S. and Say

04-02-2026

W.S. and Say

20-01-2026

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

20-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 808/2025 Court: Civil Judge (S.D.), Gangapur, Maharashtra Order Date: 20.01.2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED Prakash Rambhau Chitte sought a temporary injunction preventing Respondents 1-3 (Ravikumar Rameshwar Garg and his sons) from interfering with his joint ownership and possession of agricultural land in Aurangabad. The court found that Respondents 1-3 are the lawful owners and possessors of the property through a valid sale deed, and that the petitioner's claims regarding partition and property division were not substantiated. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 808/2025 Court: Civil Judge (S.D.), Gangapur, Maharashtra Order Date: 20.01.2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED Prakash Rambhau Chitte sought a temporary injunction preventing Respondents 1-3 (Ravikumar Rameshwar Garg and his sons) from interfering with his joint ownership and possession of agricultural land in Aurangabad. The court found that Respondents 1-3 are the lawful owners and possessors of the property through a valid sale deed, and that the petitioner's claims regarding partition and property division were not substantiated. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case