Ashok Ambadas Jadhav vs Nil — 615/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070062552025
e-Filing Number
12-09-2025
Filing Number
4527/2025
Filing Date
15-09-2025
Registration No
615/2025
Registration Date
16-09-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
2-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Ambadas Jadhav
Kantilal Ambadas Jadhav
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Documents
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Documents |
| 13-02-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the application filed by Ashok Ambadas Jadhav and Kantilal Ambadas Jadhav under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased uncle Govind Nana Jadhav (died 11.07.2022). After proper notice through newspaper publication and posting, no objections were raised, and the court found the applicants' unchallenged evidence satisfied the statutory requirements. A heirship certificate was directed to be issued, with the clarification that it constitutes only a formal declaration of heirship and is not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted the application filed by Ashok Ambadas Jadhav and Kantilal Ambadas Jadhav under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased uncle Govind Nana Jadhav (died 11.07.2022). After proper notice through newspaper publication and posting, no objections were raised, and the court found the applicants' unchallenged evidence satisfied the statutory requirements. A heirship certificate was directed to be issued, with the clarification that it constitutes only a formal declaration of heirship and is not a succession certificate for transferring valuable debts or securities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts