Renukamata multistate Co operative Urban Credit Society Ltd Ahmednagar vs Khanjekar Saurabh Raju — 1609/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast

CNR: MHAU070053392025

e-Filing Number

27-06-2025

Filing Number

4124/2025

Filing Date

02-Jul-2025

Registration No

1609/2025

Registration Date

02-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

6-Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Renukamata multistate Co operative Urban Credit Society Ltd Ahmednagar

    Adv. Shende Mahesh Arjun

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Khanjekar Saurabh Raju

  2. 2.Chandrakant Sanjay Jadhav

  3. 3.Shingare Saurabh Suresh

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  3. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  4. 13-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  5. 17-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Arbitration RD No. 1609/2025, the Civil Judge Sr. Division at Gangapur issued notice to the judgment debtor on 17.07.2025. The court directed that notice be served on the respondents (judgment debtors) to proceed with the arbitration matter. No substantive order on merits was passed in this preliminary stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 17-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1609/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Arbitration RD No. 1609/2025, the Civil Judge Sr. Division at Gangapur issued notice to the judgment debtor on 17.07.2025. The court directed that notice be served on the respondents (judgment debtors) to proceed with the arbitration matter. No substantive order on merits was passed in this preliminary stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case