Sneha Amit Gandhi vs Amit Pravin Gandhi — 39/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHAU070052352025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-06-2025
Filing Number
1178/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
FIR Details
Police Station
MIDC WALUJ
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sneha Amit Gandhi
Adv. Khajekar V.G.
Smit Amit Gandhi
Respondent(s)
Amit Pravin Gandhi
Pravin Popatlal Gandhi
Nandini Pravin Gandhi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Evidence
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 23-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Case 39/2025 Summary: The court partially allowed the interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Respondent No.01 was ordered to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1,500 per month to petitioner No.1 (wife) and Rs.1,000 per month to petitioner No.2 (child), totaling Rs.2,500 monthly from July 1, 2025, until case disposal. The petition for alternate residential accommodation was denied as petitioners have adequate shelter with family. Both parties were directed to expedite trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 39/2025 Summary: The court partially allowed the interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Respondent No.01 was ordered to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1,500 per month to petitioner No.1 (wife) and Rs.1,000 per month to petitioner No.2 (child), totaling Rs.2,500 monthly from July 1, 2025, until case disposal. The petition for alternate residential accommodation was denied as petitioners have adequate shelter with family. Both parties were directed to expedite trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts