Rahul Ramnath Khaire vs Chetan Shivnath Khaire Advocate - Shinde B.S. — 625/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU070030272025

e-Filing Number

21-04-2025

Filing Number

2233/2025

Filing Date

21-Apr-2025

Registration No

625/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

5-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Ramnath Khaire

    Adv. Raut M.A.

  2. 2.Ravindra Ramnath Khaire

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chetan Shivnath Khaire Advocate - Shinde B.S.

  2. 2.Ketan Shivnath Khaire

  3. 3.Anita Shivnath Khaire

  4. 4.Shivnath Ramnath Khaire

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 625/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Plaintiffs Rahul and Ravindra Khaire sought to restrain defendants from obstructing their access to a jointly-owned well on shared agricultural land. The court dismissed the application, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. Critically, the court noted that other co-sharers (Archana and Amit Gunjal) with rights in the well were not made parties to the suit, making any injunction order potentially unenforceable and inequitable. Costs reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  10. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  12. 09-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  13. 05-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 625/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 625/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Plaintiffs Rahul and Ravindra Khaire sought to restrain defendants from obstructing their access to a jointly-owned well on shared agricultural land. The court dismissed the application, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. Critically, the court noted that other co-sharers (Archana and Amit Gunjal) with rights in the well were not made parties to the suit, making any injunction order potentially unenforceable and inequitable. Costs reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case