Bhausaheb Ganpat Waykar vs The State Of Maharashtra — 567/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section n. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU070026732025

Filing Number

2063/2025

Filing Date

18-May-2023

Registration No

567/2025

Registration Date

19-May-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section n
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Commission Request Section Bhausaheb Ganpat WaykarThe State Of Maharashtra

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhausaheb Ganpat Waykar

    Adv. Shingare K.F.

  2. 2.Sudhakar Ganpat Waykar

    Adv. Ambekar S.K.

  3. 3.Kantabai Ganpat Waykar

    Adv. Shingare K.F.

  4. 4.Meerabai Badrinath Satale

    Adv. Shingare K.F.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

  2. 2.The Executive Sub Divisional Engineer

  3. 3.Trimbak Murlidhar Narode

    Adv. Ambekar S.K.

  4. 4.Appasaheb Murlidhar Narode

  5. 5.Baban Murlidhar Narode

  6. 6.Rajdhar Karbhari Jadhav

  7. 7.Chandrakala Bhausaheb Jadhav

  8. 8.Balasaheb Bhausaheb Jadhav

  9. 9.Ambar Bhausaheb Jadhav

  10. 10.Ushabai Ramkisan Jadhav

  11. 11.Devkabai Gorakhnath Jadhav

  12. 12.Machindra Gorakhnath Jadhav

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 567/2025 - Bhausaheb Waykar v. State of Maharashtra The plaintiffs applied to appoint a Court Commissioner to measure disputed land properties in Gut No.199, Aurangabad, citing boundary disputes with defendants. The Civil Judge rejected the application, finding no pleading or evidence that defendants committed encroachment. The court ruled that appointing a commissioner at this stage was improper, as plaintiffs must first prove prima facie possession to seek temporary injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  16. 29-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  20. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  21. 25-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  24. 06-May-2025

    No W.S. Order

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  25. 25-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  26. 21-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 18-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 567/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 567/2025 - Bhausaheb Waykar v. State of Maharashtra The plaintiffs applied to appoint a Court Commissioner to measure disputed land properties in Gut No.199, Aurangabad, citing boundary disputes with defendants. The Civil Judge rejected the application, finding no pleading or evidence that defendants committed encroachment. The court ruled that appointing a commissioner at this stage was improper, as plaintiffs must first prove prima facie possession to seek temporary injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case