Chandansingh Bharatsingh Rajput Taji vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Bhonde U.V. — 378/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU070021192025
Filing Number
1523/2025
Filing Date
09-Aug-2019
Registration No
378/2025
Registration Date
16-Aug-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandansingh Bharatsingh Rajput Taji
Adv. Shinde A.R.
-
2.Mandabai Amarsingh Rajput Taji
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - Bhonde U.V.
-
2.State of Maharashtra
-
3.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Bhonde U.V.
-
4.State of Maharashtra
-
5.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
17-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
This case involves a property dispute concerning electricity poles and power infrastructure. The petitioners, Chandansingh Bharatsingh Rajput Taji and Mandabai Amarsingh Rajput Taji, contested the installation of electrical poles and a substation on their agricultural land by the electricity distribution company (Respondent 1). The court examined evidence regarding land acquisition, compensation received, protective walls constructed around the substation, and the petitioners' claims for damages. The petition was ultimately dismissed on 17.03.2026, with the court finding insufficient grounds to support the petitioners' contentions regarding the electricity infrastructure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Compliance
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Compliance
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
24-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
10-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
23-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
08-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
16-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
01-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
14-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
31-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
04-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
16-Aug-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
02-Aug-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
18-Jul-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
07-Jul-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
27-Jun-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
10-Jun-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
03-May-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
22-Apr-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
09-Apr-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur
-
24-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 378/2025
This case involves a property dispute concerning electricity poles and power infrastructure. The petitioners, Chandansingh Bharatsingh Rajput Taji and Mandabai Amarsingh Rajput Taji, contested the installation of electrical poles and a substation on their agricultural land by the electricity distribution company (Respondent 1). The court examined evidence regarding land acquisition, compensation received, protective walls constructed around the substation, and the petitioners' claims for damages. The petition was ultimately dismissed on 17.03.2026, with the court finding insufficient grounds to support the petitioners' contentions regarding the electricity infrastructure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts