Hasan Badsha Shaikh vs Munnabano Hasan Shaikh — 263/2022
Case under Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act Section 291(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU070020542022
Filing Number
482/2022
Filing Date
05-09-2022
Registration No
263/2022
Registration Date
05-09-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hasan Badsha Shaikh
Adv. Dalvi S.K.
Respondent(s)
Munnabano Hasan Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 18-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 15-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 03-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 263/2022 Summary: The Joint Civil Judge dismissed plaintiff Hasan Badsha Shaikh's suit in default against Munnabano Hasan Shaikh due to the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and failure to take any steps to advance the case. Despite ample opportunities and a prior dismissal warning order dated 18.02.2026, the plaintiff and his advocate remained absent on the final hearing date. The court ordered dismissal of the suit and directed the plaintiff to bear all costs, finding that the prolonged absence demonstrated loss of interest in pursuing the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 263/2022 Summary: The Joint Civil Judge dismissed plaintiff Hasan Badsha Shaikh's suit in default against Munnabano Hasan Shaikh due to the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance and failure to take any steps to advance the case. Despite ample opportunities and a prior dismissal warning order dated 18.02.2026, the plaintiff and his advocate remained absent on the final hearing date. The court ordered dismissal of the suit and directed the plaintiff to bear all costs, finding that the prolonged absence demonstrated loss of interest in pursuing the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts