Rambhabai Bhausaheb Sukase vs Prakash Bhanudas Nikam — 297/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Order. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Order Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU070017572025

Filing Number

1180/2025

Filing Date

04-Oct-2019

Registration No

297/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2019

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

6-Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rambhabai Bhausaheb Sukase

    Adv. Taru D.K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Bhanudas Nikam

  2. 2.Bandu Banderao Bhanudas Nikam

  3. 3.Surekha Bandu Banderao Nikam

  4. 4.Bapu Bandu Banderao Nikam

  5. 5.Suhas Bandu Banderao Nikam

  6. 6.Lilabai Daulat Nikam

  7. 7.Walmik Daulat Nikam

  8. 8.Chaya Babasaheb Sukase

  9. 9.Geeta Sandip Sonawane

  10. 10.Shobhabai Sampat Nikam

  11. 11.Rameshwar Sampat Nikam

  12. 12.Indumati Ganesh Kolge

  13. 13.Bharti Sampat Nikam

  14. 14.Jijabai Sawaliram Shinde

  15. 15.Chandrakala Uttam Harne

  16. 16.Sunanda Bhausaheb Thote

  17. 17.Ramdas Kachru Khaladkar

  18. 18.Mukteshwar Dhondiram Ranjne

  19. 19.Ashok Vinayak Bhawar

  20. 20.State of Maharashtra

  21. 21.State of Maharashtra

  22. 22.Swapnil Sahebrao Nikam

  23. 23.Bhimraj Nana Nikam

  24. 24.Kondiram Genu Nikam

  25. 25.Kalyan Ramrao Nikam

  26. 26.Bhausaheb Bhimraj Nikam

  27. 27.Dwarkadas Bhimraj Nikam

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 297/2025 Summary: The court rejected defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. Defendants argued the suit seeking partition and declaration was barred by limitation as the challenged sale deeds were 8-30 years old. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties and cannot be decided on pleadings alone. Since the plaintiff specified the cause of action arose on 7 June 2019, and applicable limitation periods (3 years under Article 58 or 12 years under Article 110 of the Limitation Act for joint family property exclusion) were potentially satisfied, the application was rejected and the suit permitted to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  17. 01-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 18-Sep-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  21. 30-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  22. 12-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  23. 29-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  26. 17-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  27. 27-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 04-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 297/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 297/2025 Summary: The court rejected defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. Defendants argued the suit seeking partition and declaration was barred by limitation as the challenged sale deeds were 8-30 years old. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties and cannot be decided on pleadings alone. Since the plaintiff specified the cause of action arose on 7 June 2019, and applicable limitation periods (3 years under Article 58 or 12 years under Article 110 of the Limitation Act for joint family property exclusion) were potentially satisfied, the application was rejected and the suit permitted to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case