Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs State of Maharashtra — 111/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070012722026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
713/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
111/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
GANGAPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pooja Daraya Bhosle
Adv. Chavan G.B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 111/2026) The court granted Pooja Daraya Bhosle's application for release of a seized Honda motorcycle and Redmi mobile phone after establishing her ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar documentation. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that release would enable future offenses, finding no legitimate reason to withhold property from its proven owner. The motorcycle was released on a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and the mobile on a ₹10,000 bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the properties until case conclusion and must produce them as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 111/2026) The court granted Pooja Daraya Bhosle's application for release of a seized Honda motorcycle and Redmi mobile phone after establishing her ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar documentation. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that release would enable future offenses, finding no legitimate reason to withhold property from its proven owner. The motorcycle was released on a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and the mobile on a ₹10,000 bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the properties until case conclusion and must produce them as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts