Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs State of Maharashtra — 111/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070012722026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
713/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
111/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
5-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
GANGAPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pooja Daraya Bhosle
Adv. Chavan G.B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 111/2026) The court granted Pooja Daraya Bhosle's application for release of a seized Honda motorcycle and Redmi mobile phone after establishing her ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar documentation. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that release would enable future offenses, finding no legitimate reason to withhold property from its proven owner. The motorcycle was released on a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and the mobile on a ₹10,000 bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the properties until case conclusion and must produce them as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur
-
18-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur
-
16-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Gangapur
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 111/2026
Case Summary: Pooja Daraya Bhosle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 111/2026) The court granted Pooja Daraya Bhosle's application for release of a seized Honda motorcycle and Redmi mobile phone after establishing her ownership through registration certificates and Aadhaar documentation. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that release would enable future offenses, finding no legitimate reason to withhold property from its proven owner. The motorcycle was released on a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and the mobile on a ₹10,000 bond, with conditions that the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the properties until case conclusion and must produce them as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts