Sharad Hiralal Khandelwal vs NIL — 155/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th May 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU070012642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-03-2026

Filing Number

557/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Sharad Hiralal Khandelwal

Adv. Gaikwad D.L.

Badrinarayan Hiralal Khandelwal

Santosh Hiralal Khandelwal

Respondent(s)

NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR

08-05-2026

Disposed

07-05-2026

Arguments

02-05-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 155/2026 - Sharad Hiralal Khandelwal and others The court granted a heirship certificate to applicants Sharad, Badrinarayan, and Santosh Khandelwal under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased mother Narmadabai Hiralal Khandelwal (died 13.08.2016). With no objections received despite public notice publication, the court found their unchallenged evidence and affidavits sufficient to establish their entitlement to the certificate for government/semi-government purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 155/2026 - Sharad Hiralal Khandelwal and others The court granted a heirship certificate to applicants Sharad, Badrinarayan, and Santosh Khandelwal under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased mother Narmadabai Hiralal Khandelwal (died 13.08.2016). With no objections received despite public notice publication, the court found their unchallenged evidence and affidavits sufficient to establish their entitlement to the certificate for government/semi-government purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case