Asha Deepak Jadhav vs Asaram Govindrao Ghodke Advocate - Ambekar S.K. — 142/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section n. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Ready Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU070010452025

Filing Number

472/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2020

Registration No

142/2025

Registration Date

06-Aug-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur

Judge

6-Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section n
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Interrogatories Section Asha Deepak JadhavAsaram Govindrao Ghodke

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asha Deepak Jadhav

    Adv. Taru D.K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Asaram Govindrao Ghodke Advocate - Ambekar S.K.

  2. 2.Bhimabai Sulabai Asaram Ghodke

  3. 3.Balu Asaram Ghodke

  4. 4.Bhimraj Asaram Ghodke

  5. 5.Arjun Asaram Ghodke

  6. 6.Sunita Balasaheb Ghodke

  7. 7.Savitribai Arjun Ghodke

  8. 8.Sundarlal Nilu Adhagale

  9. 9.Ashok Bhausaheb Pankade

    Adv. Ambekar S.K.

  10. 10.Sanjay Ramnath Kalaskar

  11. 11.Ravi Sundarlal Adhagale

  12. 12.Suman Bhanudas Udmalle

  13. 13.Balasaheb Asaram Gaikwad

    Adv. Ambekar S.K.

  14. 14.Sk. Awez Sk. Kadir

  15. 15.State of Maharashtra

  16. 16.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  16. 09-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  17. 09-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 142/2025 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Plaintiff Asha Deepak Jadhav directed to pay court fee for "possession" relief within one month; failure to do so will result in further orders against her. Key Issue: Whether plaintiff must pay court fee based on valuation of eight sale-deeds (worth Rs.41,97,000) that she seeks to cancel, despite not being a party to them. Ruling: Court held plaintiff is not bound to pay court fee on the entire valuation of sale-deeds since she was not a party to them. However, because her suit includes a claim for "possession" as relief in a partition action, she must pay court fee for that specific relief only, within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 09-May-2025

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  19. 06-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  21. 11-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Senior Division Gangapur

  22. 13-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 04-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 142/2025 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Plaintiff Asha Deepak Jadhav directed to pay court fee for "possession" relief within one month; failure to do so will result in further orders against her. Key Issue: Whether plaintiff must pay court fee based on valuation of eight sale-deeds (worth Rs.41,97,000) that she seeks to cancel, despite not being a party to them. Ruling: Court held plaintiff is not bound to pay court fee on the entire valuation of sale-deeds since she was not a party to them. However, because her suit includes a claim for "possession" as relief in a partition action, she must pay court fee for that specific relief only, within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case