Sunita Chintaman Borude vs Nil — 156/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070007722025
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
230/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
25-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Chintaman Borude
Adv. Lande S.K.
Rutuja Chintaman Borude
Vishal Chintaman Borude
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 10-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 17-12-2025 | Amended Plaint |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 156/2025 Summary: The Joint Civil Judge dismissed the applicants' (Sunita, Rutuja, and Vishal Chintaman Borude) application for issuance of a heirship certificate in default on 12/03/2026. The court found that despite the application being pending since 25/02/2025 with multiple hearing dates and adequate opportunities, the applicants remained continuously absent without just cause and failed to proceed with the matter, demonstrating loss of interest. The applicants were ordered to bear the entire costs of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 156/2025 Summary: The Joint Civil Judge dismissed the applicants' (Sunita, Rutuja, and Vishal Chintaman Borude) application for issuance of a heirship certificate in default on 12/03/2026. The court found that despite the application being pending since 25/02/2025 with multiple hearing dates and adequate opportunities, the applicants remained continuously absent without just cause and failed to proceed with the matter, demonstrating loss of interest. The applicants were ordered to bear the entire costs of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts