Shaminabi khalil pathan vs Shaikh Kadu Shaikh Ibrahim Advocate - Chaudhari Kuldip — 11/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU070002062025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-01-2025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
10-01-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
10-01-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaminabi khalil pathan
Adv. Taru D.K.
Soyab Khalil Pathan
Jafar Khalil Pathan
Hina Khalil Pathan
Respondent(s)
Shaikh Kadu Shaikh Ibrahim Advocate - Chaudhari Kuldip
Shakir @ Babu Kadu Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 28-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
In RCS No.11/2025, the defendants' application under Section 151 CPC to set aside an order passed without hearing them on 23/12/2025 was allowed. The court found that defendants had repeatedly and intentionally delayed proceedings on the urgent Exh.5 application across multiple dates, but granted them one final opportunity to argue on Exh.5 forthwith, balancing both parties' interests while protecting the plaintiff's right to timely urgent relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In RCS No.11/2025, the defendants' application under Section 151 CPC to set aside an order passed without hearing them on 23/12/2025 was allowed. The court found that defendants had repeatedly and intentionally delayed proceedings on the urgent Exh.5 application across multiple dates, but granted them one final opportunity to argue on Exh.5 forthwith, balancing both parties' interests while protecting the plaintiff's right to timely urgent relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts