Sunil Karbhari Pawar vs Nil — 16/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU070000312026
e-Filing Number
27-12-2025
Filing Number
23/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gangapur
Judge
4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Karbhari Pawar
Adv. Pradip Ratnakar Barde
Babasaheb Karbhari Pawar
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 4-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., GANGAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sunil Karbhari Pawar v. Nil (Civil M.A./16/2026) The court granted Sunil Karbhari Pawar and Babasaheb Karbhari Pawar's application for an heirship certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of their deceased parents Karbhari Laxman Pawar (died 08.01.2022) and Janabai Karbhari Pawar (died 15.05.2012). With no objections filed despite public notice in newspapers and at local offices, the court found the applicants' unchallenged affidavits and supporting documents sufficient to establish their heirship for government and semi-government purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sunil Karbhari Pawar v. Nil (Civil M.A./16/2026) The court granted Sunil Karbhari Pawar and Babasaheb Karbhari Pawar's application for an heirship certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulations Act, 1827, formally recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of their deceased parents Karbhari Laxman Pawar (died 08.01.2022) and Janabai Karbhari Pawar (died 15.05.2012). With no objections filed despite public notice in newspapers and at local offices, the court found the applicants' unchallenged affidavits and supporting documents sufficient to establish their heirship for government and semi-government purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts