Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Nasir vs Lalita Manmohan Bhartiya — 444/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU060026122022
Filing Number
589/2022
Filing Date
25-11-2022
Registration No
444/2022
Registration Date
25-11-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Nasir
Adv. Satdive R.B.
Respondent(s)
Lalita Manmohan Bhartiya
Manmohan Babulal Bhartiya
Dharamchand Babulal Chudiwal
Shaikh Ahemad Shaikh Mahebub
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 04-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 04-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case for default of the plaintiff Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Nasir on March 12, 2026. The plaintiff was absent on call and his advocate requested dismissal; the court found that no steps had been taken by the plaintiff for an extended period, indicating lack of interest in proceeding, and therefore dismissed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case for default of the plaintiff Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Nasir on March 12, 2026. The plaintiff was absent on call and his advocate requested dismissal; the court found that no steps had been taken by the plaintiff for an extended period, indicating lack of interest in proceeding, and therefore dismissed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts