Yogesh Abarao Nikam vs State of Maharashtra — 327/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU060025502025
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
1677/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
327/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
Deogaon R
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Abarao Nikam
Adv. Shirse S.A.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Yogesh Abarao Nikam v. State of Maharashtra (327/2025) The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (used to illegally transport seven cattle in violation of animal cruelty laws) on conditional bail. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must pay ₹200 daily per animal for their care at a goshala (₹1,87,200 total), furnish a ₹5,00,000 bond, cannot modify or sell the vehicle until trial concludes, and must produce it when directed. The court found prima facie violations of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and animal transport regulations, but determined the vehicle owner could be released while holding both owner and driver jointly liable for animal welfare costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Yogesh Abarao Nikam v. State of Maharashtra (327/2025) The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (used to illegally transport seven cattle in violation of animal cruelty laws) on conditional bail. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must pay ₹200 daily per animal for their care at a goshala (₹1,87,200 total), furnish a ₹5,00,000 bond, cannot modify or sell the vehicle until trial concludes, and must produce it when directed. The court found prima facie violations of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and animal transport regulations, but determined the vehicle owner could be released while holding both owner and driver jointly liable for animal welfare costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts