Yogesh Abarao Nikam vs State of Maharashtra — 327/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU060025502025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-12-2025

Filing Number

1677/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

327/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

Deogaon R

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Yogesh Abarao Nikam

Adv. Shirse S.A.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

09-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

01-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Yogesh Abarao Nikam v. State of Maharashtra (327/2025) The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (used to illegally transport seven cattle in violation of animal cruelty laws) on conditional bail. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must pay ₹200 daily per animal for their care at a goshala (₹1,87,200 total), furnish a ₹5,00,000 bond, cannot modify or sell the vehicle until trial concludes, and must produce it when directed. The court found prima facie violations of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and animal transport regulations, but determined the vehicle owner could be released while holding both owner and driver jointly liable for animal welfare costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Yogesh Abarao Nikam v. State of Maharashtra (327/2025) The court allowed the petitioner's application to recover his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (used to illegally transport seven cattle in violation of animal cruelty laws) on conditional bail. The court imposed strict conditions: the petitioner must pay ₹200 daily per animal for their care at a goshala (₹1,87,200 total), furnish a ₹5,00,000 bond, cannot modify or sell the vehicle until trial concludes, and must produce it when directed. The court found prima facie violations of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and animal transport regulations, but determined the vehicle owner could be released while holding both owner and driver jointly liable for animal welfare costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case