Vilas Asaram Giri vs Kalyan Asaram Giri Advocate - Satdive R.B. — 387/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39, R1,2. Status: A. D. R.. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU060023352022
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
515/2022
Filing Date
14-10-2022
Registration No
387/2022
Registration Date
14-10-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas Asaram Giri
Adv. Raut R.D.
Respondent(s)
Kalyan Asaram Giri Advocate - Satdive R.B.
Meghraj Asaram Giri
Shobhabai Kalyan Giri
Divya Meghraj Giri
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
A. D. R.
A. D. R.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | A. D. R. |
| 13-03-2026 | A. D. R. |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 387/2022 Court Order (Marathi): Land dispute case between brothers Vilas Asaram Giri (petitioner) and Kalyan Asaram Giri (respondent) concerning 5 acres of agricultural land in Takali, Kannad taluka, Aurangabad district. Petitioner sought interim injunction to prevent respondent from interfering with his land possession. Court granted petitioner's interim relief application (Petition No. 5) and dismissed respondent's counter-application (Petition No. 33), issuing a temporary injunction restraining respondent and family members from obstructing petitioner's use of the 5-acre plot. Costs reserved for final judgment (Order dated 13.03.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 387/2022 Court Order (Marathi): Land dispute case between brothers Vilas Asaram Giri (petitioner) and Kalyan Asaram Giri (respondent) concerning 5 acres of agricultural land in Takali, Kannad taluka, Aurangabad district. Petitioner sought interim injunction to prevent respondent from interfering with his land possession. Court granted petitioner's interim relief application (Petition No. 5) and dismissed respondent's counter-application (Petition No. 33), issuing a temporary injunction restraining respondent and family members from obstructing petitioner's use of the 5-acre plot. Costs reserved for final judgment (Order dated 13.03.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts