Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Pathasanstha Marayadit Aurangabad Br Pishor vs Umesh Gokul Mokase — 908/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU060022402025
e-Filing Number
18-10-2025
Filing Number
1464/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
908/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
4-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Pathasanstha Marayadit Aurangabad Br Pishor
Adv. Mene G.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Umesh Gokul Mokase
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
28-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
27-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 908/2025 Summary In this criminal case filed by Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Pathasanstha Marayadit Aurangabad against Umesh Gokul Mokase, the court prima facie found the accused guilty of forging a document under Section 138 of the Indian Penal Code, 1881. The court issued an order under Section 227 of the CrPC 2023 to proceed with the case. The accused was directed to appear before the court on the next scheduled date, with the option to file a settlement application if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 908/2025
Case 908/2025 Summary In this criminal case filed by Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Pathasanstha Marayadit Aurangabad against Umesh Gokul Mokase, the court prima facie found the accused guilty of forging a document under Section 138 of the Indian Penal Code, 1881. The court issued an order under Section 227 of the CrPC 2023 to proceed with the case. The accused was directed to appear before the court on the next scheduled date, with the option to file a settlement application if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts