State of Maharashtra vs Raju Damu Ghuge — 888/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12,a. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU060021202024

Filing Number

1436/2024

Filing Date

11-Oct-2024

Registration No

888/2024

Registration Date

11-Oct-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

2-Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

Pishore

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12,a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Damu Ghuge

  2. 2.Prashant Ramhari Nagare

  3. 3.Appa Bajirao Avhad

  4. 4.Pandit Lala Nagare

  5. 5.Krushna Narayan Raut

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 888/2024 Summary: The court stopped proceedings against five accused charged under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Act due to inability to secure their presence despite repeated efforts, as they remained on warrant. The court discharged all accused under Section 258 of CrPC, forfeited seized cash of Rs. 4,430, and cancelled bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  5. 24-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  6. 19-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    IInd Jt.civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kannad

  7. 21-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    IInd Jt.civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kannad

  8. 11-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 888/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 888/2024 Summary: The court stopped proceedings against five accused charged under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Act due to inability to secure their presence despite repeated efforts, as they remained on warrant. The court discharged all accused under Section 258 of CrPC, forfeited seized cash of Rs. 4,430, and cancelled bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case