State of Maharashtra vs Mayur Jaywantrao Pawar — 228/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU060014892021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-09-2021

Filing Number

1173/2021

Filing Date

04-10-2021

Registration No

228/2021

Registration Date

04-10-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

244

Police Station

Kannad City

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 498-A,323,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Mayur Jaywantrao Pawar

Rahul Jaywantrao Pawar

Kanta Jaywantrao Pawar

Aarti Kalyan Gayake

Bharti Amol Thorat

Ambhay Bhausaheb Sarangdhar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

04-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

23-01-2026

Discussion

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mayur Jaywantrao Pawar and Others (228/2021) The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), and 34 (common intention). The key witness—the complainant wife—testified that after initial marital discord, she reconciled with her husband and is currently living with him, effectively undermining the prosecution's case of sustained dowry harassment and domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mayur Jaywantrao Pawar and Others (228/2021) The court acquitted all six accused of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), and 34 (common intention). The key witness—the complainant wife—testified that after initial marital discord, she reconciled with her husband and is currently living with him, effectively undermining the prosecution's case of sustained dowry harassment and domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case