Rajendra Babu Rathod vs Shivlal Janu Chavan Advocate - Nimbhorkar M.V. — 181/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU060013702021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
296/2021
Filing Date
15-09-2021
Registration No
181/2021
Registration Date
16-09-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Babu Rathod
Adv. Chavan V.K.
Respondent(s)
Shivlal Janu Chavan Advocate - Nimbhorkar M.V.
Varshibai Shivlal Chavan
Bhangi Shivlal Chavan
Sachin Shivlal Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: 181/2021 Petitioner: Rajendra Babu Rathod Respondents: Shivlal Janu Chavan Advocate and others Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request for a permanent injunction restraining respondents from obstructing the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the disputed property (agricultural land in Kannur, Aurangabad district). The court also directed the respondents to pay the petitioner's legal costs and issued a perpetual injunction against further interference. The property ownership was confirmed in the petitioner's favor based on documentary evidence including a sale deed dated 05.10.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 181/2021 Petitioner: Rajendra Babu Rathod Respondents: Shivlal Janu Chavan Advocate and others Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request for a permanent injunction restraining respondents from obstructing the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the disputed property (agricultural land in Kannur, Aurangabad district). The court also directed the respondents to pay the petitioner's legal costs and issued a perpetual injunction against further interference. The property ownership was confirmed in the petitioner's favor based on documentary evidence including a sale deed dated 05.10.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts