State of Maharashtra vs Jayaji Supadu Wankhede Advocate - Chavan B.J. — 403/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU060010422021
Filing Number
807/2021
Filing Date
27-07-2021
Registration No
403/2021
Registration Date
27-07-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
2-JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Pishore
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Jayaji Supadu Wankhede Advocate - Chavan B.J.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 18-09-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jayaji Supadu Wankhede (403/2021) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Judicial Magistrate found that the accused was not traceable despite diligent efforts, the case was old and stale, and there was no prospect of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the accused was acquitted, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized bottles were directed for disposal by the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jayaji Supadu Wankhede (403/2021) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Judicial Magistrate found that the accused was not traceable despite diligent efforts, the case was old and stale, and there was no prospect of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the accused was acquitted, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized bottles were directed for disposal by the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts