Maharashtra Gramin Bank vs Sunil Sudamrao Dehade — 337/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Plea / Particulars. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU060008402025
e-Filing Number
09-04-2025
Filing Number
513/2025
Filing Date
15-Apr-2025
Registration No
337/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
4-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Kannad City
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maharashtra Gramin Bank
Adv. Kulkarni Rajesh R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil Sudamrao Dehade
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
12-Mar-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
22-Jan-2026
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
11-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
09-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
07-Aug-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad
-
16-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 337/2025 Summary: The court found a prima facie case of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respondent Sunil Sudamrao Dehade. An FIR was ordered under Section 227 of the CrPC 2023, and the respondent was summoned to appear before the court. The respondent was permitted to file a settlement application and instructed regarding verification procedures for the evidence filed by Maharashtra Gramin Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 337/2025
Case 337/2025 Summary: The court found a prima facie case of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respondent Sunil Sudamrao Dehade. An FIR was ordered under Section 227 of the CrPC 2023, and the respondent was summoned to appear before the court. The respondent was permitted to file a settlement application and instructed regarding verification procedures for the evidence filed by Maharashtra Gramin Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts