Jaylal Magan Rathod vs State of Maharashtra — 70/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU060005532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

416/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Kannad Rural

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Jaylal Magan Rathod

Adv. Rathod V.B.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Jaylal Magan Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (70/2026) The court approved the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized tractor and trailer (involved in an alleged minerals theft case under mining law). The court granted custody under Section 503 CrPC, subject to a bond of Rs. 8,00,000 and conditions including non-alteration of the vehicle, non-sale until trial conclusion, and mandatory production when required, finding the petitioner was the rightful owner with legitimate need for the vehicle's personal and domestic use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jaylal Magan Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (70/2026) The court approved the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized tractor and trailer (involved in an alleged minerals theft case under mining law). The court granted custody under Section 503 CrPC, subject to a bond of Rs. 8,00,000 and conditions including non-alteration of the vehicle, non-sale until trial conclusion, and mandatory production when required, finding the petitioner was the rightful owner with legitimate need for the vehicle's personal and domestic use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case