Jaylal Magan Rathod vs State of Maharashtra — 70/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU060005532026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

416/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

4-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Kannad Rural

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaylal Magan Rathod

    Adv. Rathod V.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Jaylal Magan Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (70/2026) The court approved the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized tractor and trailer (involved in an alleged minerals theft case under mining law). The court granted custody under Section 503 CrPC, subject to a bond of Rs. 8,00,000 and conditions including non-alteration of the vehicle, non-sale until trial conclusion, and mandatory production when required, finding the petitioner was the rightful owner with legitimate need for the vehicle's personal and domestic use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jaylal Magan Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (70/2026) The court approved the petitioner's application for interim custody of a seized tractor and trailer (involved in an alleged minerals theft case under mining law). The court granted custody under Section 503 CrPC, subject to a bond of Rs. 8,00,000 and conditions including non-alteration of the vehicle, non-sale until trial conclusion, and mandatory production when required, finding the petitioner was the rightful owner with legitimate need for the vehicle's personal and domestic use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case