Sandhekha Hasankha Pathan vs Sakinabee Sandekha Pathan Advocate - Dhandar J.S. — 44/2019
Case under Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act Section 281(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU060005222019
Filing Number
67/2019
Filing Date
08-03-2019
Registration No
44/2019
Registration Date
11-03-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandhekha Hasankha Pathan
Adv. Mohammed A.S.
Respondent(s)
Sakinabee Sandekha Pathan Advocate - Dhandar J.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 19-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-10-2025 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 44/2019 Summary: The court dismissed the case filed by Sandhekha Hasankha Pathan against Sakinabee Sandekha Pathan for default of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and his advocate confirmed he was unreachable. Finding that no steps had been taken in the matter for a considerable time, the court concluded the plaintiff lacked interest in proceeding and issued a dismissal order accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 44/2019 Summary: The court dismissed the case filed by Sandhekha Hasankha Pathan against Sakinabee Sandekha Pathan for default of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and his advocate confirmed he was unreachable. Finding that no steps had been taken in the matter for a considerable time, the court concluded the plaintiff lacked interest in proceeding and issued a dismissal order accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts