Sachin Gangadhar Pawar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Ghate P.P. — 60/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU060004532026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
333/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad
Judge
3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
214
Police Station
Kannad City
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sachin Gangadhar Pawar
Adv. Thorat N.B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Ghate P.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IInd JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KANNAD
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sachin Gangadhar Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 60/2026) The court allowed Pawar's application under Section 503 BNSS for interim custody of his seized Redmi 12 mobile phone (used in a gambling investigation), finding him the rightful owner based on purchase receipt and Aadhar verification. The court rejected police arguments about misuse risk, reasoning that no purpose was served by keeping an unused device at the station where it would deteriorate, and imposed safeguards including a ₹12,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations, and detailed photographic documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sachin Gangadhar Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. No. 60/2026) The court allowed Pawar's application under Section 503 BNSS for interim custody of his seized Redmi 12 mobile phone (used in a gambling investigation), finding him the rightful owner based on purchase receipt and Aadhar verification. The court rejected police arguments about misuse risk, reasoning that no purpose was served by keeping an unused device at the station where it would deteriorate, and imposed safeguards including a ₹12,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alterations, and detailed photographic documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts