Shailesh Bhikulal Jaiswal vs State of Maharashtra — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU060003932026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

296/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

2-JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

Pishore

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shailesh Bhikulal Jaiswal

Adv. Borse Sanjay S.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JT.CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KANNAD

09-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Order

06-04-2026

Documents

04-04-2026

Documents

02-04-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 52/2026 The court allowed Shailesh Jaiswal's application for interim custody of a seized Realmi 7 Pro mobile phone, finding he was the legitimate owner based on purchase documentation. The court reasoned that keeping the property idle at the police station would cause him economic loss and that returning it subject to conditions would not harm the prosecution. Jaiswal was granted custody on executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: he must produce the phone when directed, cannot alter or alienate it, and faces forfeiture of the bond if conditions are breached. The investigating officer must photograph and document the handover via panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 52/2026 The court allowed Shailesh Jaiswal's application for interim custody of a seized Realmi 7 Pro mobile phone, finding he was the legitimate owner based on purchase documentation. The court reasoned that keeping the property idle at the police station would cause him economic loss and that returning it subject to conditions would not harm the prosecution. Jaiswal was granted custody on executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: he must produce the phone when directed, cannot alter or alienate it, and faces forfeiture of the bond if conditions are breached. The investigating officer must photograph and document the handover via panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case