Shailesh Bhikulal Jaiswal vs State of Maharashtra — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU060003932026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

296/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Kannad

Judge

2-Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Pishore

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shailesh Bhikulal Jaiswal

    Adv. Borse Sanjay S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 52/2026 The court allowed Shailesh Jaiswal's application for interim custody of a seized Realmi 7 Pro mobile phone, finding he was the legitimate owner based on purchase documentation. The court reasoned that keeping the property idle at the police station would cause him economic loss and that returning it subject to conditions would not harm the prosecution. Jaiswal was granted custody on executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: he must produce the phone when directed, cannot alter or alienate it, and faces forfeiture of the bond if conditions are breached. The investigating officer must photograph and document the handover via panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Documents

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Documents

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  12. 04-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  13. 27-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kannad

  15. 20-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 52/2026 The court allowed Shailesh Jaiswal's application for interim custody of a seized Realmi 7 Pro mobile phone, finding he was the legitimate owner based on purchase documentation. The court reasoned that keeping the property idle at the police station would cause him economic loss and that returning it subject to conditions would not harm the prosecution. Jaiswal was granted custody on executing a ₹25,000 indemnity bond, with strict conditions: he must produce the phone when directed, cannot alter or alienate it, and faces forfeiture of the bond if conditions are breached. The investigating officer must photograph and document the handover via panchanama. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case