Pallavi Rohit Bhalekar vs Rohit Shankarrao Bhalekar Advocate - Rajput S.T. — 228/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU050039152025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-08-2025
Filing Number
1313/2025
Filing Date
08-08-2025
Registration No
228/2025
Registration Date
14-08-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
6-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pallavi Rohit Bhalekar
Adv. Baig J.N.
Respondent(s)
Rohit Shankarrao Bhalekar Advocate - Rajput S.T.
Mirabai Shankarrao Bhalekar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Evidence
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 228/2025 Pallavi Rohit Bhalekar v. Rohit Bhalekar and others The application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for interim maintenance of Rs. 50,000/month was partly allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence (physical abuse, emotional abuse, illegal demands, and financial neglect) and held the husband legally obligated to maintain his wife. However, the court awarded Rs. 2,500/month instead of the claimed amount, considering the applicant's needs and the respondent's presumed earning capacity, directing payment from the application date until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 228/2025 Pallavi Rohit Bhalekar v. Rohit Bhalekar and others The application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for interim maintenance of Rs. 50,000/month was partly allowed. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence (physical abuse, emotional abuse, illegal demands, and financial neglect) and held the husband legally obligated to maintain his wife. However, the court awarded Rs. 2,500/month instead of the claimed amount, considering the applicant's needs and the respondent's presumed earning capacity, directing payment from the application date until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts