Sana Raju Mansuri vs Mohammad Sharukh Khaja Mansuri — 391/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506,143,147,149,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU050033222022

Filing Number

1854/2022

Filing Date

27-Sep-2022

Registration No

391/2022

Registration Date

01-Oct-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

2-II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506,143,147,149,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sana Raju Mansuri

    Adv. Peerzada R.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Sharukh Khaja Mansuri

  2. 2.Safiya Khaja Mansuri

  3. 3.Wasim Khaja Mansuri

  4. 4.Arif Khaja Mansuri

  5. 5.Nassho Imran Mansuri

  6. 6.Ashu Khaja Mansuri

  7. 7.Imran Rashid Mansuri

  8. 8.Khaja Mansuri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Vaijapur Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sana Raju Mansuri's private complaint against Mohammad Sharukh Khaja Mansuri and others (filed under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 149, 34) for want of prosecution on 06.05.2026. The complainant remained continuously absent since verification began on 02.11.2022, took no effective steps despite the matter being posted for dismissal in January 2026, and failed to appear even when repeatedly called. Given the case's 3+ year pendency and the complainant's apparent loss of interest, the court deemed continued adjournment purposeless and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Dismissal Order

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  8. 23-Jun-2025

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  9. 20-Mar-2025

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  10. 10-Jan-2025

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  11. 04-Nov-2024

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  12. 21-Aug-2024

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  13. 04-Jun-2024

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  14. 19-Mar-2024

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  15. 16-Jan-2024

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  16. 24-Nov-2023

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  17. 15-Sep-2023

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  18. 28-Jun-2023

    Verification

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  19. 09-May-2023

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  20. 07-Feb-2023

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  21. 21-Dec-2022

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  22. 02-Nov-2022

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  23. 03-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 27-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Vaijapur Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sana Raju Mansuri's private complaint against Mohammad Sharukh Khaja Mansuri and others (filed under IPC Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 149, 34) for want of prosecution on 06.05.2026. The complainant remained continuously absent since verification began on 02.11.2022, took no effective steps despite the matter being posted for dismissal in January 2026, and failed to appear even when repeatedly called. Given the case's 3+ year pendency and the complainant's apparent loss of interest, the court deemed continued adjournment purposeless and dismissed the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case