State of Maharashtra vs Sudhir Kaduba Sarkale — 668/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 224,269,271. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU050026082020

Case disposed

Filing Number

1696/2020

Filing Date

24-12-2020

Registration No

668/2020

Registration Date

24-12-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

265

Police Station

VAIJAPUR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 224,269,271
Disaster Management Act Section 51B

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Sudhir Kaduba Sarkale

Hearing History

Judge: 2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-01-2026

Appearance

24-07-2025

Appearance

29-04-2025

Appearance

08-10-2024

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sudhir Kaduba Sarkale (668/2020) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code after the case remained pending for over 5 years without progress. Despite multiple summons and non-bailable warrants, police failed to secure the accused's presence, making continued prosecution impractical and uneconomical. The court exercised its discretion under the Bombay High Court's special drive initiative for ineffective cases, canceling the accused's bail bonds and terminating proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sudhir Kaduba Sarkale (668/2020) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code after the case remained pending for over 5 years without progress. Despite multiple summons and non-bailable warrants, police failed to secure the accused's presence, making continued prosecution impractical and uneconomical. The court exercised its discretion under the Bombay High Court's special drive initiative for ineffective cases, canceling the accused's bail bonds and terminating proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case