Anita Navnath Jadhav vs Navnath Janardhan Jadhav — 276/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU050025842024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-09-2024
Filing Number
1458/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
276/2024
Registration Date
19-09-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
6-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anita Navnath Jadhav
Adv. Thot T.M.
Sonali Navnath Jadhav
Adv. SHINDE RAJU HARIBHAU
Rupali Navnath Jadhav
Adv. SHINDE RAJU HARIBHAU
Aarti Navnath Jadhav
Adv. SHINDE RAJU HARIBHAU
Puja Navnath Jadhav
Adv. SHINDE RAJU HARIBHAU
Respondent(s)
Navnath Janardhan Jadhav
Machindra Janardhan Jadhav
Walubai Machindra Jadhav
Gokul Janardhan Jadhav
Sunita Gokul Jadhav
Sangitabai Babasaheb Gund
Alkabai Bhausaheb Sonawane
Hearing History
Judge: 6-III JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case 276/2024 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Vaijapur) ordered that the application be proceeded ex-parte against Respondent No. 2 (Macchindra Janardhan Jadhav) and Respondent No. 3 (Valhubai Macchindra Jadhav) after they failed to appear despite due service of notice. The Protection Officer's report was filed on record, and the notice was properly received by Respondent No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 276/2024 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Vaijapur) ordered that the application be proceeded ex-parte against Respondent No. 2 (Macchindra Janardhan Jadhav) and Respondent No. 3 (Valhubai Macchindra Jadhav) after they failed to appear despite due service of notice. The Protection Officer's report was filed on record, and the notice was properly received by Respondent No. 1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts