Vaishali Vicky Shelar vs Vicky Babasaheb Shelar — 176/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,23. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Depositing Amount Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU050014692024

e-Filing Number

10-06-2024

Filing Number

838/2024

Filing Date

11-Jun-2024

Registration No

176/2024

Registration Date

13-Jun-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vaishali Vicky Shelar

    Adv. Thorat R.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vicky Babasaheb Shelar

  2. 2.Babasaheb Eknath Shelar

  3. 3.Sangita Babasaheb Shelar

  4. 4.Jamunabai Eknath Shelar

  5. 5.Ujwala Ganesh Shendage

  6. 6.Kamalbai Sanju Shelar

  7. 7.Sindhubai Balasaheb Shelar

  8. 8.Avinash Balasaheb Shelar

  9. 9.Yuvraj Sanju Shelar

  10. 10.Rupali Balasaheb Shelar

  11. 11.Payal Sanju Shelar

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 176/2024 Vaishali Vicky Shelar v. Vicky Babasaheb Shelar and Others The court partially granted the petitioner's interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence against the petitioner and ordered the first respondent to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the petitioner's housing, food, clothing, and medical expenses. The petitioner's claim for an interim protection order preventing violent acts was rejected due to insufficient allegations in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  11. 02-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  13. 06-May-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  14. 05-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  15. 07-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  16. 18-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  17. 16-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  18. 13-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 13-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  20. 09-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  21. 28-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  22. 19-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  23. 14-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 11-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 176/2024 Vaishali Vicky Shelar v. Vicky Babasaheb Shelar and Others The court partially granted the petitioner's interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence against the petitioner and ordered the first respondent to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the petitioner's housing, food, clothing, and medical expenses. The petitioner's claim for an interim protection order preventing violent acts was rejected due to insufficient allegations in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case