Vaishali Vicky Shelar vs Vicky Babasaheb Shelar — 176/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,23. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU050014692024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-06-2024
Filing Number
838/2024
Filing Date
11-06-2024
Registration No
176/2024
Registration Date
13-06-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaishali Vicky Shelar
Adv. Thorat R.S.
Respondent(s)
Vicky Babasaheb Shelar
Babasaheb Eknath Shelar
Sangita Babasaheb Shelar
Jamunabai Eknath Shelar
Ujwala Ganesh Shendage
Kamalbai Sanju Shelar
Sindhubai Balasaheb Shelar
Avinash Balasaheb Shelar
Yuvraj Sanju Shelar
Rupali Balasaheb Shelar
Payal Sanju Shelar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 12-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 03-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 14-01-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 24-12-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 176/2024 Vaishali Vicky Shelar v. Vicky Babasaheb Shelar and Others The court partially granted the petitioner's interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence against the petitioner and ordered the first respondent to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the petitioner's housing, food, clothing, and medical expenses. The petitioner's claim for an interim protection order preventing violent acts was rejected due to insufficient allegations in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 176/2024 Vaishali Vicky Shelar v. Vicky Babasaheb Shelar and Others The court partially granted the petitioner's interim application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence against the petitioner and ordered the first respondent to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the petitioner's housing, food, clothing, and medical expenses. The petitioner's claim for an interim protection order preventing violent acts was rejected due to insufficient allegations in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts