Babasaheb Balwant Warkar vs State of Maharashtra — 98/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU050011502025
e-Filing Number
07-04-2025
Filing Number
639/2025
Filing Date
09-04-2025
Registration No
98/2025
Registration Date
11-04-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
State Excise
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babasaheb Balwant Warkar
Adv. Bhavar B.B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 20-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 17-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 16-04-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri. M. A. No. 98/2025 The court allowed Babasaheb Balwant Warkar's application and ordered the State Excise Police to return his seized Honda DIO moped (used in alleged illegal liquor transportation under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act) on interim custody basis. The court granted return despite prosecution objections regarding risk of re-offense, finding the applicant's ownership evident and relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting return on appropriate conditions. The vehicle was released subject to a ₹1.5 lakh bond, with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unauthorized use until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri. M. A. No. 98/2025 The court allowed Babasaheb Balwant Warkar's application and ordered the State Excise Police to return his seized Honda DIO moped (used in alleged illegal liquor transportation under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act) on interim custody basis. The court granted return despite prosecution objections regarding risk of re-offense, finding the applicant's ownership evident and relying on Supreme Court precedent permitting return on appropriate conditions. The vehicle was released subject to a ₹1.5 lakh bond, with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or unauthorized use until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts